Where minds can meet, to dissent, concurr, or agree to disagree on current public policy issues or litigation. "Un lugar donde las mentes pueden reunirse a discutir,concurrir o estar en desacuerdo en intereses de casos legales contemporaneos".
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
IN PLENO LUMINE: Constitutional Amendment
IN PLENO LUMINE: Constitutional Amendment: 8th Amendment Octavo Emendation e What is the Eighth Amendment? Excessive bail shall not be required, no excessive fine...
Constitutional Amendment
8th Amendment
Octavo Emendatione
What is the Eighth Amendment?
Excessive bail shall not be required, no excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The Eighth Amendment Defined:
.- See more at: http://constitution.laws.com/8th-amendment#sthash.qC5dDg6l.dpuf
Octavo, quae sit Emendatione? .- See more at: http://constitution.laws.com/8th-amendment#sthash.qC5dDg6l.dpuf
Nimis vadimonium non oportet, neque nimis multae dictae, et crudeliter et insolita poena.
Octava Emendatione definitione:
In Octava MDCCXCI emendatione libellus de jure cohaereat.
- Vide plura: http://constitution.laws.com/8th-amendment # sthash.qC5dDg6l.dpuf
What does the 8th Amendment mean - WikiAnswers
Monday, March 10, 2014
IN PLENO LUMINE: Seventh Constitutional Amendment
IN PLENO LUMINE: Seventh Constitutional Amendment: Right to Jury Trial in civil cases civilibus ad juratam iudicium What are your thoughts in regard to having a right to a jury trial in ...
Seventh Constitutional Amendment
Right to Jury Trial in civil cases
civilibus ad juratam iudicium
What are your thoughts in regard to having a right to a jury trial in Civil cases? Do you think it would be beneficial for a civil matter to be decided amongst a jury of peers? The seventh amendment leaves it up to each individual state to determine this. What are your thoughts?
Quid cogitas de civilibus jurata ad propositum? Utrum existimatis statuendum civili conducat iuratam inter pares? Septimum ab illo, usque ad emendationem, ut unusquisque status etiam. Quid cogitas?
civilibus ad juratam iudicium
What are your thoughts in regard to having a right to a jury trial in Civil cases? Do you think it would be beneficial for a civil matter to be decided amongst a jury of peers? The seventh amendment leaves it up to each individual state to determine this. What are your thoughts?
Quid cogitas de civilibus jurata ad propositum? Utrum existimatis statuendum civili conducat iuratam inter pares? Septimum ab illo, usque ad emendationem, ut unusquisque status etiam. Quid cogitas?
Thursday, January 9, 2014
IN PLENO LUMINE: FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE US. CONSTITUTION
IN PLENO LUMINE: FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE US. CONSTITUTION: BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON POLICE PROCEDURE Due process, grand juries, double jeopardy. What does this all mean in laymen terms? De...
FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE US. CONSTITUTION
BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON POLICE PROCEDURE
Due process, grand juries, double jeopardy. What does this all mean in laymen terms?
Debitum, magna iudices, hanc causam duplicem. Quid hoc sibi vult ea in laicis?
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides,
El Quinto Enmendamiento de la Costitucion Estadounidense provee,
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
What is your understanding of the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution? Do you feel that it is appropriately defined and interpreted for all citizens in laymen terms? Or are the terms interpreted differently, dependent upon which walk of life we are on? Does Due Process mean the same for a politician as it does for an ordinary citizen with little education or even a college education? What are your thoughts on the aforementioned? Please see below for a refresher on the terms and definitions, let me know how you would interpret them. I would love to hear from you.
Cual es su entendimiento acerca del Quinto Enmendamiento a La Consitucion Estadounidense? Cree usted que los terminos son definidos e interpretados appropiadamente para todos los ciudadanos en terminos comprensibles? O, son los terminos interpretados diferentemente, dependiendo en cual camino estamos en la vida? El "Debido Processo" significa lo mismo para un politico tanto como a un ciudano mundano con poca educacion o aun con educacion universitaria? Cuales son sus pensamientos acerca de este tema? Haga favor de repasar los terminos y definiciones, y dejeme saber como los interpretaria. Me encantaria escuchar su opinion.
Results
Grand jury - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Due process, grand juries, double jeopardy. What does this all mean in laymen terms?
Debitum, magna iudices, hanc causam duplicem. Quid hoc sibi vult ea in laicis?
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides,
El Quinto Enmendamiento de la Costitucion Estadounidense provee,
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
What is your understanding of the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution? Do you feel that it is appropriately defined and interpreted for all citizens in laymen terms? Or are the terms interpreted differently, dependent upon which walk of life we are on? Does Due Process mean the same for a politician as it does for an ordinary citizen with little education or even a college education? What are your thoughts on the aforementioned? Please see below for a refresher on the terms and definitions, let me know how you would interpret them. I would love to hear from you.
Cual es su entendimiento acerca del Quinto Enmendamiento a La Consitucion Estadounidense? Cree usted que los terminos son definidos e interpretados appropiadamente para todos los ciudadanos en terminos comprensibles? O, son los terminos interpretados diferentemente, dependiendo en cual camino estamos en la vida? El "Debido Processo" significa lo mismo para un politico tanto como a un ciudano mundano con poca educacion o aun con educacion universitaria? Cuales son sus pensamientos acerca de este tema? Haga favor de repasar los terminos y definiciones, y dejeme saber como los interpretaria. Me encantaria escuchar su opinion.
Results
Grand jury - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
IN PLENO LUMINE: Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment to t...
IN PLENO LUMINE:
Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment to t...: Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: El Cuarto enmendamiento a la Constitucion Estadounidense ...
Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment to t...: Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: El Cuarto enmendamiento a la Constitucion Estadounidense ...
Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:
El Cuarto enmendamiento a la Constitucion Estadounidense se lee asi:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.What are your thoughts on the fourth amendment? Do you believe that as private citizens we should be able to maintain our privacy without government intrusion? or, do you think the government should be able to do so in certain cases?
Please give your opinion.
Cuales son sus pensamientos acerca de el cuarto enmendamiento? Cree usted que como ciudadanos se tiene el derecho a la privacidad sin intrusion gubernamental? o, piensa que en ciertos casos el gobierno podria hacerlo?
Deme su opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)